24-70mm Showdown - Nikon F vs Z vs Tamron vs Sigma Art
Matt Granger
13 min, 9 sec
A detailed hands-on comparison of Nikon F-mount, Tamron G2, Sigma Art, and Z mount 24-70mm lenses, including image quality, tracking, low-light performance, and price considerations.
Summary
- Tested Nikon F-mount, Tamron G2, Sigma Art, and Z mount 24-70mm lenses using various cameras and settings.
- Nikon's F-mount lens shows age with no clear advantage; Tamron G2 offers significant value for its price.
- Sigma Art lens is heavier, more expensive, and optically slightly behind Tamron and Nikon F-mount.
- Z mount lens excels in performance, autofocus speed, and image quality but comes at a higher price.
Chapter 1
Introduction to the comparison of Nikon F-mount, Z mount, Tamron G2, and Sigma Art 24-70mm lenses.
- Announced a showdown comparing Nikon F-mount, Z mount, Tamron G2, and Sigma Art lenses.
- Mentioned an image quality comparison had been done previously.
- Highlighted the intention to update the comparison due to lens updates.
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Detailed specifications of each lens being compared in the showdown.
- Discussed the Nikon 24-70 F-mount non-VR version's age, price, weight, and lens construction.
- Evaluated the Tamron G2's build quality, price, weight, and lens elements.
- Reviewed the Sigma Art's build, weight, price, and lens complexity.
- Outlined the Nikon Z mount's features, weight, lens elements, price, and lack of in-lens stabilization.
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Final evaluation and recommendations based on the comparison tests.
- Concluded that Nikon's F-mount lens is outdated and Tamron G2 offers great value for its price.
- Sigma Art lens is heavier and not recommended over the others unless brand loyalty is a factor.
- Z mount lens has the best performance but at a higher cost, making it a choice for those with a higher budget.
- For budget-conscious buyers, Tamron is the recommended option.