A threatening phone call
Dr. John Campbell
7 min, 7 sec
The video covers a talk given on December 27th where the speaker discusses good news about a parliamentary motion, concerning actions by the MHRA, and troubling high death rates in the UK.
Summary
- The speaker opens with a welcome and moves on to highlight a parliamentary motion set for January 16th regarding excess deaths, encouraging UK viewers to contact their MPs.
- A significant part of the talk focuses on the MHRA's alleged inappropriate communications with the press regarding the coverage of vaccine side effects.
- The speaker expresses concern over high death rates among younger and middle-aged adults in the UK and the lack of adequate public discussion on the issue.
- Details from The Daily Telegraph reveal that the MHRA attempted to influence media reporting, raising issues of transparency and public trust.
- An article from the BMJ is cited, questioning the integrity of drug regulators due to the significant portion of their funding coming from the industry they regulate.
Chapter 1
The speaker begins by welcoming the audience and announcing a parliamentary motion to discuss excess deaths.
- The talk takes place on December 27th, following the Christmas holiday.
- The speaker encourages UK viewers to write to their MPs about attending a debate on January 16th regarding excess deaths.
Chapter 2
The speaker discusses concerning actions by the MHRA to influence media reporting on vaccine side effects.
- The MHRA reportedly sent communications to The Daily Telegraph threatening to ban them from briefings if they did not soften their news coverage.
- A senior MHRA official is said to have made a threatening phone call to the newspaper.
- The speaker criticizes the MHRA for overstepping its role as a regulator by attempting to control the media narrative.
Chapter 3
The speaker raises concerns about the integrity of drug regulators due to industry funding.
- The BMJ article states that a majority of drug regulators' budgets, including the MHRA, come from industry fees.
- 86% of the MHRA's budget is reportedly industry-funded, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.
Chapter 4
The speaker reflects on the paternalistic attitude of the government and some media outlets towards public information.
- The Daily Telegraph article discusses instances of media censorship and the importance of the public's access to information.
- The speaker agrees with the Telegraph's stance that hiding facts can also cost lives and that the public is capable of making informed decisions.
Chapter 5
The speaker concludes the talk by reiterating the significance of the issues discussed and providing references.
- The speaker is taken aback by the MHRA's attempt to control the narrative and emphasizes the importance of fact-sharing.
- References are provided for the audience to review the British Medical Journal article on drug regulators' funding.
More Dr. John Campbell summaries
Everyone was susceptible
Dr. John Campbell
A detailed analysis of COVID-19 pandemic assumptions, comparisons with historical pandemics, and the impact of modeling and policy decisions.
Dr Craig, pathologist, part 2
Dr. John Campbell
A comprehensive examination of various beliefs and protocols established during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the response, testing accuracy, and implications of virus variants.
Asymptomatic spread
Dr. John Campbell
The video discusses the myths surrounding asymptomatic spread of diseases, historical public health beliefs, and the misuse of PCR tests.
Heart disease press release
Dr. John Campbell
The video discusses the concerning rise in excess deaths globally, with a detailed focus on the increase in cardiovascular-related fatalities.
White clots common
Dr. John Campbell
A comprehensive study reveals the prevalence of abnormal and potentially lethal blood clots in deceased individuals, with a focus on the association with recent medical interventions.