Rylee Miller is introduced as a law student, clerk, and undecided Republican.

• Rylee Miller is a law student at Drake University.
• Miller works as a clerk in the Marion County Attorney's office.
• He is identified as a Republican who has not yet decided on his presidential candidate choice.

Miller questions the candidate's balance of authenticity and presidential demeanor on the debate stage.

• Miller expresses concern over the candidate's lack of tact and diplomacy on the debate stage.
• He seeks to understand how the candidate balances authenticity with maintaining a presidential demeanor.
• The candidate appreciates the question and acknowledges the high standard to which presidents should be held.

The candidate responds by emphasizing the importance of being a role model for children and responding strongly to challenges.

• The candidate wants children to look up to the president and to grow up to emulate him.
• He promotes the idea that while being non-violent and not a bully, it is important to respond firmly to aggression.
• Authenticity is maintained while protecting kindness, according to the candidate.

The candidate talks about his experience with podcasts and the importance of behaving appropriately in different contexts.

• The candidate has participated in numerous podcasts, which he considers a different setting compared to other media.
• He cites the book of Ecclesiastes, mentioning that there is a time and place for everything, including fortitude, justice, and mercy.
• The candidate believes that embodying these attributes is essential for leading and reuniting the country.

The candidate faces questioning about his previous comments on the January 6th event being an inside job.

• The host refers to a previous debate where the candidate mentioned the phrase 'inside job' concerning January 6th.
• The host points out that a convicted rioter used the candidate's comments during sentencing.
• The candidate discusses his concerns about government actions and the way the media portrays events.

The candidate elaborates on his views about government entrapment and the suppression of evidence regarding January 6th.

• The candidate claims the government has lied systematically over the years, using the COVID-19 origin and Trump-Russia collusion as examples.
• He implies that there may have been federal law enforcement agents involved in January 6th but does not provide definitive evidence.
• The host challenges the candidate's claims, leading to a heated exchange over the interpretation of events and the use of the term 'inside job'.