Do Spacecraft Really Have To Endure The Hazards of Reentry
Scott Manley
12 min, 23 sec
Scott Manley discusses the challenges of re-entry heat management for spacecraft returning from space missions.
Summary
- Scott Manley analyzes the video footage from the Aran capsule during the EMIS-1 mission re-entry, noting the visible glow from atmospheric heating.
- He explains the kinetic energy involved in re-entry from the moon at speeds over 11 km/s and the necessity of heat shields for spacecraft.
- Manley addresses questions about alternative methods to avoid re-entry heating, such as slowing down in orbit or gliding through the atmosphere at high altitudes.
- He uses the rocket equation to demonstrate the impracticality of slowing down using propulsion due to the mass of propellant required.
- The video also covers the limitations of lift-to-drag ratios in spacecraft design, the role of aerobraking, and the possibility of using inflatable heat shields for future missions.
Chapter 1
Scott Manley introduces a re-entry video from the EMIS-1 mission featuring the Aran capsule.
- Manley finds the inclusion of audio in the re-entry footage captivating, with sounds of thruster firings and re-entry heating audible.
- The video shows the spacecraft glows due to the heat generated as it re-enters Earth's atmosphere from the moon.
Chapter 2
Exploration of the kinetic energy involved in spacecraft re-entry and the role of heat shields.
- During re-entry from the moon, a spacecraft travels over 11 km/s, and each kilogram of it holds about 60 mega joules of energy.
- The intense energy causes the air around the spacecraft to glow, indicating that energy is being dissipated into the atmosphere rather than the spacecraft itself.
- Heat shields are crucial for protecting spacecraft and future human passengers from the massive energy encountered during re-entry.
Chapter 3
Manley discusses two commonly proposed alternative methods for re-entry to avoid intense heating.
- The first idea is to slow the spacecraft down in orbit to reduce re-entry speeds, and the second is to have a winged vehicle glide at high altitudes before re-entering.
- Both ideas are well-intentioned but not feasible according to Manley, and the following explanations are provided to support his claim.
Chapter 4
Manley explains why slowing down the spacecraft in orbit is impractical using the rocket equation.
- Slowing down a spacecraft by 5 km/s in orbit would require a significant amount of propellant, making the method impractical compared to using a heat shield.
- The rocket equation shows that for a 10-ton spacecraft, you would need an additional 42 tons of propellant to slow down sufficiently for a safer re-entry.
Chapter 5
Manley addresses the concept of using a winged vehicle to glide in the atmosphere for re-entry.
- Gliding at high altitudes is limited by the spacecraft's lift-to-drag ratio, which determines how much energy it must dissipate during descent.
- The space shuttle, for example, had a modest lift-to-drag ratio, leading to significant heating even with a controlled glide through the atmosphere.
Chapter 6
Further discussion on aerodynamics and physics involved in spacecraft re-entry.
- Aerobraking can be used for gradually reducing orbit, but once velocity is lower than low Earth orbit, a spacecraft must commit to re-entry.
- The lift generated by a vehicle during re-entry must balance the gravitational pull, which in turn creates drag and leads to heating.
Chapter 7
An explanation of the lift-to-drag ratio and its implications for spacecraft design.
- Different vehicles have varying lift-to-drag ratios, with gliders achieving very high ratios and space capsules having ratios of less than one.
- Crafts with higher lift-to-drag ratios can glide for longer, but they still generate significant heat that must be managed.
Chapter 8
Manley discusses the theoretical limits of lift-to-drag ratios for spacecraft.
- Increasing the lift-to-drag ratio can reduce the temperature of the spacecraft during re-entry, but not sufficiently to eliminate the need for heat shields.
- The shape of the spacecraft affects its aerodynamics and heating, with pointy shapes experiencing more heating than rounded ones.
Chapter 9
Manley introduces the concept of inflatable heat shields and their potential benefits for future space missions.
- Inflatable heat shields could significantly reduce re-entry heating by increasing the surface area and creating a larger buffer between the spacecraft and the hot re-entry plasma.
- The successful LOFTID experiment demonstrated the feasibility of inflatable heat shields for deceleration in orbit and potential recovery of rocket engines.
Chapter 10
Manley explores the idea of a 'space Zeppelin' as an alternative spacecraft design.
- A space Zeppelin would feature an expanded surface area to keep the heating layer away from the spacecraft's surface, potentially eliminating the need for a heat shield.
- JP Aerospace's Airship to Orbit concept suggests that such a space Zeppelin could be feasible for careful orbital ascent and re-entry.
Chapter 11
Manley concludes that re-entry heating is an unavoidable aspect of space travel that must be managed.
- Despite various ideas and theoretical possibilities, re-entry heating is a challenge that cannot be easily circumvented through propulsion or aerodynamics.
- Manley emphasizes that managing re-entry heat remains a complex problem, requiring sophisticated solutions like heat shields.