How Engineers Straightened the Leaning Tower of Pisa

Practical Engineering

Practical Engineering

13 min, 17 sec

An in-depth look at the history of the Leaning Tower of Pisa's tilt and the modern engineering efforts to stabilize it.

Summary

  • The Leaning Tower of Pisa's tilt began during its construction due to uneven ground composed of sand and clay.
  • Modern intervention to prevent collapse started in 1990 with a tilt of 5.5 degrees, leading to the tower's closure.
  • Initial stabilization involved counterweights, while the permanent fix used underexcavation to correct the tilt slightly.
  • The successful stabilization effort reversed the tower's lean to the state it was in the early 1800s.

Chapter 1

The Tower's Historical Tilt and Initial Construction

0:01 - 3 min, 0 sec

The Leaning Tower of Pisa's historical tilt originated from its initial construction on uneven sediment deposits.

The Leaning Tower of Pisa's historical tilt originated from its initial construction on uneven sediment deposits.

  • A river in Italy deposited sand and clay unevenly in the area where Pisa now stands, creating unstable ground.
  • Construction of the tower began around 1173, and its tilt became apparent early on, leading builders to compensate during construction.
  • The tower's inclination reached 4.9 degrees by 1817 and continued to increase until modern times.

Chapter 2

20th Century Crisis and Initial Response

3:06 - 1 min, 34 sec

By 1990, the tower's tilt had reached a critical point, prompting the Italian Government to seek a stabilization solution.

By 1990, the tower's tilt had reached a critical point, prompting the Italian Government to seek a stabilization solution.

  • The tilt reached a peak in 1990, leading to the closure of the tower and the formation of an expert committee.
  • The committee conducted extensive testing, including soil analysis and computer modeling, to assess the tower's stability.
  • Immediate stabilization measures included a concrete ring and lead counterweights to halt the increasing lean.

Chapter 3

Temporary Measures and Setbacks

4:45 - 1 min, 5 sec

Temporary stabilization measures were successful, but a later anchoring plan resulted in increased tilt.

Temporary stabilization measures were successful, but a later anchoring plan resulted in increased tilt.

  • The lead counterweights initially reduced the tilt, which encouraged the committee to consider deeper anchoring.
  • The anchoring plan was abandoned when the tower began to tilt further due to structural dependencies on the surrounding walkway.
  • Additional lead weights were added to counteract the renewed tilt, and focus shifted to a permanent solution.

Chapter 4

Permanent Stabilization Challenges and Ideas

5:57 - 1 min, 43 sec

The committee faced challenges in devising a permanent solution that would preserve the tower's historical appearance.

The committee faced challenges in devising a permanent solution that would preserve the tower's historical appearance.

  • Solutions had to consider historical preservation and were complicated by the need to maintain a specific amount of lean.
  • Ideas included groundwater removal and electro-osmosis, but these were rejected due to unpredictability and soil conductivity.
  • The final idea, underexcavation, involved removing soil beneath the tower to correct the tilt.

Chapter 5

Successful Underexcavation and Final Adjustments

7:45 - 2 min, 35 sec

Underexcavation was tested and implemented, resulting in a significant reduction of the tower's tilt.

Underexcavation was tested and implemented, resulting in a significant reduction of the tower's tilt.

  • After testing on a model, underexcavation began with a safeguard system of cable stays to control unwanted movement.
  • A preliminary trial showed positive results, and the final plan involved 41 holes and the removal of 38 cubic meters of soil.
  • The tower's tilt was reduced by about half a degree, and the lead counterweights and drainage system were adjusted accordingly.

Chapter 6

Reflecting on the Project and Educational Content

10:50 - 1 min, 58 sec

The presenter reflects on the ingenuity of the stabilization project and recommends educational content from independent creators.

The presenter reflects on the ingenuity of the stabilization project and recommends educational content from independent creators.

  • The precision of the underexcavation process is highlighted as a remarkable engineering feat.
  • The presenter recommends 'The Logistics of X' series for deep dives into various industries.
  • Nebula, an ad-free streaming platform for independent educational creators, is promoted as a source of in-depth content.

More Practical Engineering summaries

Why Railroads Don't Need Expansion Joints

Why Railroads Don't Need Expansion Joints

Practical Engineering

Practical Engineering

The video explains the transition from jointed railway tracks to continuous welded rail (CWR) and how railways manage thermal expansion and prevent issues like buckling.