The YouTube team outlines specific violations related to privacy policy, API services usage, and content handling.

• YouTube alleges a product or service is offered without displaying the privacy policy or explaining how user information is used.
• The service is accused of facilitating offline playback and copyright infringement.
• YouTube demands compliance with its Terms of Service and Developer Policies.

The accused party responds to YouTube's allegations, denying any violations and asserting their independence from YouTube API services.

• The response outlines Futo's respect for content creators and intention to connect them with their audience.
• It asserts that Futo does not use YouTube API Services, therefore the terms do not apply.
• The accused questions YouTube's understanding of antitrust laws and their legal priorities.

The accused challenges YouTube's approach and hints at readiness for a legal battle.

• The accused points out their successful advocacy for right to repair and readiness to take legal action.
• The response criticizes YouTube's monopolistic behavior and hints at the accused's financial capability to fight back.
• The accused asserts that they find the confrontation with YouTube as an opportunity rather than a threat.