The segment introduces Dr. Jeffrey Wigand's conflict with Brown & Williamson, detailing the company's efforts to discredit him and his revelations about the harmful effects of cigarettes.

• Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, a former director of research at Brown & Williamson, faced a campaign to destroy his reputation after he disclosed harmful truths about cigarettes.
• Brown & Williamson, the third-largest tobacco company in America, employed law firms and PR consultants to discredit Wigand.
• CBS was initially reluctant to air Wigand's interview due to the risk of a multi-billion dollar lawsuit.

This chapter discusses the initial CBS decision not to air Wigand's claims, the Wall Street Journal's publication of his deposition, and CBS's eventual broadcast of the interview.

• After the Wall Street Journal published a confidential deposition by Wigand, CBS reconsidered and aired his story.
• Wigand claimed that Brown & Williamson knew about the addictive nature of nicotine and the dangers of their tobacco products.
• The airing of the interview revealed internal conflicts and scientific knowledge within the tobacco industry.

This chapter summarizes the scientific and technical details provided by Wigand regarding nicotine manipulation and other additives in tobacco products.

• Wigand explained the use of ammonia to enhance the effect of nicotine, a process known as 'impact boosting'.
• Brown & Williamson's internal documents showed awareness of nicotine addiction and the use of carcinogenic additives.
• Wigand's efforts to create safer cigarettes were hindered by legal intervention and corporate decisions.

The chapter delves into Wigand's internal battles at Brown & Williamson, his ultimate dismissal, and the personal repercussions he faced.

• Wigand's disputes over the additive coumarin and safer cigarettes led to his firing from Brown & Williamson.
• Post-dismissal, Wigand faced a lawsuit from the company, which resulted in financial and personal distress, including marital separation.
• Brown & Williamson's aggressive tactics to undermine Wigand included legal action and discrediting his character.

The segment outlines the intensifying legal challenges and public defamation campaign that Wigand faced after his dismissal.

• Brown & Williamson sued Wigand and cut off his severance and health benefits, alleging confidentiality violations.
• Wigand's family life was disrupted, and he received anonymous threats after speaking with government investigators.
• A media campaign led by Brown & Williamson sought to tarnish Wigand's reputation by spreading allegations about his past.

This chapter covers the repercussions Wigand faced for his whistleblowing and the support he received from legal and medical professionals.

• Wigand's whistleblowing led to a significant impact on his personal and professional life, including a divorce filing by his wife.
• Despite Brown & Williamson's attacks, Wigand found support from state attorneys general, who viewed his testimony as credible and vital for lawsuits against the tobacco industry.
• Wigand's commitment to revealing the truth is showcased by his willingness to endure hardships for the cause of public health.

The final chapter presents Brown & Williamson's defense against Wigand's allegations and the conclusion of the story.

• Brown & Williamson refuted many of Wigand's claims and insisted on the lawful nature of their products and practices.
• CBS's financial support for Wigand in the legal battle with Brown & Williamson was questioned, but CBS maintained its objective reporting stance.
• Despite the controversy, the focus remained on Wigand's efforts to expose the tobacco industry's deceit and the health risks of smoking.