Mr. Andrew Bridgen is introduced before giving his speech to the House of Commons.

• The speaker gives a warm welcome to the presentation.
• The date is established as Thursday, the 18th of April.
• Anticipation is built for Mr. Bridgen's important speech.

Discussion of the metaphorical divide between the public and the members of Parliament.

• A physical glass sheet separates the public gallery from the MPs, symbolizing a metaphorical divide.
• Public cheer is heard at the end of the speech, suggesting support from the gallery.
• The speaker is threatened with clearing the public gallery, hinting at democratic concerns.

Mr. Bridgen criticizes the House of Commons for their response to the pandemic and excess deaths.

• Challenges the lack of scientific education among MPs and their reliance on guidelines.
• Accuses doctors of blindly following orders and ignoring good science.
• Alleges that public inquiries and evidence are being ignored or hidden.

Bridgen addresses the issue of excess deaths and the lack of transparency in data sharing.

• Details the consistent rate of excess deaths in 2023 and the alteration of systems to potentially obscure data.
• Condemns the withholding of data from the public and scientific investigators.
• Criticizes changes to the baseline population level calculations and the implications for reported excess deaths.

Bridgen clarifies his stance on vaccines and the role of scientific background in policymaking.

• Defends his position on vaccines, stating he is not anti-vaccine but critical of the COVID-19 vaccine's efficacy.
• Expresses pride in having a science degree and laments the lack of scientific background among MPs.
• Emphasizes the seriousness of the debate and future scrutiny of the current decisions.

Bridgen discusses the suppression of key data and the government's marketing approach to the vaccine.

• Accuses officials of deliberately hiding key data related to vaccine safety.
• Questions the removal of weekly data releases on death rates based on vaccination status.
• Criticizes the media and government for acting as marketing agencies for the vaccine.

Mr. Bridgen challenges the narrative of vaccine safety and efficacy.

• Highlights the contractual admission by Pfizer of unknown long-term vaccine effects.
• Questions the validity of the 'safe and effective' slogan and presents evidence to the contrary.
• Reveals compensation payments made for vaccine harm and compares historical claims.

Bridgen points to Australia as a case study for excess deaths and calls for an inquiry.

• Mentions Australia's inquiry into excess deaths and the unique timing of their vaccine rollout.
• Notes the rise in emergency calls for heart attacks and respiratory issues following vaccine distribution.
• Calls for similar scrutiny in the UK to determine the cause of excess deaths.

The speech addresses concerns about the potential cancer risks associated with the vaccines.

• Explores the implications of the vaccine's spike protein and its systemic spread.
• Discusses the potential for vaccines to disturb DNA and the hidden SV40 sequences found in vaccines.
• Relays findings from Japanese studies that suggest a correlation between cancer rates and vaccination.

Mr. Bridgen concludes his speech with a call to action for the government.

• Summarizes the evidence suggesting vaccines have caused harm and death.
• Challenges the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing infection, illness, and death.
• Urges the government to suspend mRNA vaccine use and support an inquiry into their safety.

The public gallery's reaction to Mr. Bridgen's speech and the Speaker's warning.

• The public gallery responds with applause after the speech.
• The Speaker warns against further clapping and threatens to clear the gallery if it continues.