Revealed: Building Material Breathability Experiment (surprising result)

Skill Builder

Skill Builder

8 min, 0 sec

A detailed experiment was conducted to assess the breathability of various building materials, highlighting the vapor permeability of traditional and modern mixes.

Summary

  • An experiment was conducted to determine the breathability of common building materials, particularly focusing on lime versus other materials.
  • Materials tested included sand and cement mixes at different ratios, natural hydraulic lime (NHL) of different strengths, and Dry Zone renovation plaster.
  • Petri dishes were filled with materials, sealed, and water evaporation was measured over 12 months at 16°C to simulate vapor permeability.
  • Results showed sand and cement mixes had varying degrees of breathability, with a 6:1 sand to cement to lime mix being the most vapor permeable.
  • NHL at a 3.5 strength was almost as breathable as a 6:1 mix but NHL at 5.1 strength was less so; Dry Zone High Lime had similar permeability to NHL mixes.

Chapter 1

Introduction to the Breathability Experiment

0:01 - 19 sec

The experiment was introduced to determine the breathability of common building materials with an emphasis on lime.

The experiment was introduced to determine the breathability of common building materials with an emphasis on lime.

  • The team set out to explore which building materials allow a house to 'breathe' by conducting a long-term experiment.
  • Lime was a material of interest due to its reputation for breathability in construction.

Chapter 2

Setting Up the Experiment

0:23 - 46 sec

The experiment was meticulously set up using Petri dishes filled with various materials and water to simulate vapor permeability.

The experiment was meticulously set up using Petri dishes filled with various materials and water to simulate vapor permeability.

  • Petri dishes were filled with materials like sand, NHL lime, and cement in various ratios to represent different mortar mixes.
  • Water was placed in cups with the material samples sealed on top to ensure only vapor could pass through the material.

Chapter 3

Long-Term Monitoring and Conditions

1:12 - 35 sec

The experiment was conducted under natural conditions without acceleration to faithfully simulate building drying times.

The experiment was conducted under natural conditions without acceleration to faithfully simulate building drying times.

  • The experiment was designed to be long-term, mimicking the slow drying process of buildings, with water left to evaporate at room temperature.
  • Evaporation was not influenced by external pressures or heat to ensure the results reflected only the material's breathability.

Chapter 4

Experiment Results and Analysis

2:00 - 2 min, 22 sec

The experiment yielded surprising results, revealing the effectiveness of various material mixes in allowing vapor to pass through.

The experiment yielded surprising results, revealing the effectiveness of various material mixes in allowing vapor to pass through.

  • Sand and cement mix at a 3:1 ratio and rapid set plaster were the least breathable.
  • Increasing the sand ratio and adding hydrated lime improved vapor permeability.
  • NHL lime showed varied results based on strength, with 3.5 being nearly as permeable as a 6:1 sand to cement to lime mix.
  • Dry Zone High Lime had comparable breathability to NHL limes.

Chapter 5

Conclusions and Recommendations

5:04 - 2 min, 21 sec

Conclusions were drawn about the ideal material mixes for breathability and the self-healing properties of lime.

Conclusions were drawn about the ideal material mixes for breathability and the self-healing properties of lime.

  • A 6:1 sand to cement to lime mix is preferred for repointing due to its vapor permeability and the self-healing properties of lime.
  • Hydrated lime is recommended over hydraulic lime for most cases as it is more readily available and effective.

Chapter 6

Addressing Skepticism and Future Experiments

7:26 - 32 sec

Anticipating skepticism, the presenter defended the experiment's methodology and suggested future studies to address more myths.

Anticipating skepticism, the presenter defended the experiment's methodology and suggested future studies to address more myths.

  • Anticipating criticism, the presenter affirms the consistency of the water levels and the integrity of the experimental conditions.
  • The presenter invites suggestions for future experiments to debunk other construction myths.