Trump’s Threats COME BACK TO HAUNT HIM as Prosecutors Lay It All Out

MeidasTouch

MeidasTouch

11 min, 4 sec

A detailed analysis of the new cooperator and evidence that could be damning for Donald Trump in his upcoming trial.

Summary

  • Jack Smith has filed a motion indicating powerful new evidence and a cooperator against Donald Trump for the January 6 case.
  • The motion filed is a 404b, seeking permission to present evidence of prior bad acts or uncharged crimes.
  • The evidence suggests Trump's efforts to interfere with the Electoral College vote count and intentions to overturn the election results.
  • There are indications of a cooperator who might testify about aggressive tactics being part of the plan that Trump was aware of.
  • Additional evidence aims to show that Trump and his co-conspirators suppressed evidence proving their fraud claims were false.

Chapter 1

Introduction to Jack Smith's Motion

0:00 - 22 sec

Initial remarks on Jack Smith's new evidence and cooperator in the case against Donald Trump.

Initial remarks on Jack Smith's new evidence and cooperator in the case against Donald Trump.

  • Jack Smith has a new cooperator and has filed a motion with new evidence against Donald Trump.
  • The evidence has not been seen prior and could have significant impact on Trump's trial in Washington DC.

Chapter 2

Details of Trump's Federal Trial

0:22 - 55 sec

Overview of the charges against Trump and the timeline of the conspiracy.

Overview of the charges against Trump and the timeline of the conspiracy.

  • The trial pertains to the January 6 case, with Trump as the only defendant facing four different charges.
  • The charges relate to a short conspiracy from November 2020 to January 2021, attempting to interfere with the Electoral College vote count.

Chapter 3

Understanding the 404b Motion

1:17 - 2 min, 12 sec

Explanation of the 404b motion and its implications for the trial.

Explanation of the 404b motion and its implications for the trial.

  • A 404b motion is standard procedure to seek permission to include evidence of prior bad acts or uncharged crimes.
  • The prosecutor is typically limited to evidence within the indictment, but exceptions can be made for motive, intent, or absence of mistake.

Chapter 4

Evidence of Pre-Meditated Actions

3:29 - 3 min, 2 sec

Analysis of evidence suggesting premeditated efforts to obstruct the vote count.

Analysis of evidence suggesting premeditated efforts to obstruct the vote count.

  • Text exchanges between a campaign employee and an attorney for the campaign in Detroit suggested rioting to obstruct the vote count.
  • The redacted section might contain further details on the employee's actions and their connection to Trump.

Chapter 5

Post-Conspiracy Suppression and Retaliation

6:31 - 3 min, 28 sec

Discussion of the efforts to suppress proof against fraud claims and retaliate against those who refuted them.

Discussion of the efforts to suppress proof against fraud claims and retaliate against those who refuted them.

  • Evidence indicates that Trump and his co-conspirators continued to suppress dissent and retaliate against officials even after January 2021.
  • The actions of co-conspirator number one, believed to be Giuliani, are highlighted as part of these efforts.

Chapter 6

Concluding Remarks and Predictions

9:59 - 1 min, 3 sec

Final thoughts on the potential impact of the new cooperator and evidence on the trial.

Final thoughts on the potential impact of the new cooperator and evidence on the trial.

  • The evidence presented by the special counsel's office appears compelling and might be backed by a cooperator.
  • Predictions are made about the evidence being admitted as part of the 404b motion.

More MeidasTouch summaries

Trump Gets SHUTDOWN by Court of Appeals in MAJOR Gag Order RULING

Trump Gets SHUTDOWN by Court of Appeals in MAJOR Gag Order RULING

MeidasTouch

MeidasTouch

The video is a comprehensive analysis of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling affirming most of the gag order imposed on Donald Trump in relation to his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. The hosts, Ben Melis and Karen Fredman, explain the legal implications and potential broader impacts of the ruling.

Jack Smith WAS MY CO-WORKER, I Knew HE’D END Trump

Jack Smith WAS MY CO-WORKER, I Knew HE’D END Trump

MeidasTouch

MeidasTouch

The video reflects on the events of 2023, focusing on the appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel in the Trump case and his qualifications and actions.

Fox Attempt to HELP JD Vance BACKFIRES on LIVE TV

Fox Attempt to HELP JD Vance BACKFIRES on LIVE TV

MeidasTouch

MeidasTouch

The video discusses JD Vance's controversial statements about childless individuals and his appearance on Fox News, where he fails to apologize and instead doubles down on his comments.