Why I deleted GrapheneOS

Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann

17 min, 51 sec

The video discusses the GrapheneOS project, the interactions with its developer, and the decision to stop using the OS due to concerns over the developer's behavior.

Summary

  • The creator speaks positively about GrapheneOS and has advocated for it, including securing a $40,000 grant for the project.
  • The creator shares a set of messages from Daniel Micay of GrapheneOS expressing dissatisfaction with the creator's comment on a video by Techlore.
  • Daniel Micay accuses the creator of complicity in harassment against him due to the creator's comment on Techlore's video and threatens to ban the creator from GrapheneOS platforms.
  • The creator defends their right to criticize and voices discomfort with Daniel Micay's communication style and perceived threats.
  • Ultimately, the creator decides to stop using GrapheneOS, citing an inability to trust the code written by someone exhibiting such behaviors.

Chapter 1

Introduction to GrapheneOS Advocacy

0:00 - 19 sec

The creator begins by expressing support for GrapheneOS and detailing efforts to attract positive attention to the project.

The creator begins by expressing support for GrapheneOS and detailing efforts to attract positive attention to the project.

  • The creator uses GrapheneOS personally and has tried to support the project through positive attention.
  • They facilitated a $40,000 grant for GrapheneOS through their employer.

Chapter 2

Conflict With GrapheneOS Developer

0:19 - 1 min, 8 sec

The creator discusses a conflict with GrapheneOS developer Daniel Micay regarding a comment on a Techlore video.

The creator discusses a conflict with GrapheneOS developer Daniel Micay regarding a comment on a Techlore video.

  • Daniel Micay contacted the creator about a supportive comment left on a video by Techlore, which presented Micay in a negative light.
  • Micay accused the creator of supporting harassment against him due to the comment.

Chapter 3

Creator's Stance on Communication and Misinformation

1:27 - 1 min, 17 sec

The creator explains their position on the importance of communication and the need to address misinformation.

The creator explains their position on the importance of communication and the need to address misinformation.

  • The creator feels that Daniel Micay's communication style is abrasive and can reflect poorly on the project.
  • They highlight their own efforts to debunk misconceptions about GrapheneOS and promote its benefits.

Chapter 4

Proposal for an Interview With GrapheneOS Developer

2:44 - 1 min, 19 sec

The creator describes their attempt to arrange an interview with Daniel Micay to discuss GrapheneOS and address concerns.

The creator describes their attempt to arrange an interview with Daniel Micay to discuss GrapheneOS and address concerns.

  • The creator has interviewed other project leaders who received grants and wanted to offer the same opportunity to Micay.
  • Micay refused the interview due to the creator's perceived support for Techlore.

Chapter 5

Escalation and Ultimatum from GrapheneOS Developer

4:03 - 1 min, 17 sec

The situation escalates as Daniel Micay gives the creator an ultimatum regarding their support for Techlore.

The situation escalates as Daniel Micay gives the creator an ultimatum regarding their support for Techlore.

  • Micay threatens to ban the creator from GrapheneOS platforms and publish information about their 'attacks' on him.
  • The creator stands by their right to express disappointment and refuses to remove their comment.

Chapter 6

Reevaluation of Trust in GrapheneOS

5:20 - 2 min, 38 sec

The creator reevaluates their trust in GrapheneOS following the interactions with its developer.

The creator reevaluates their trust in GrapheneOS following the interactions with its developer.

  • The creator questions their comfort in using an operating system from a developer who has exhibited aggressive and accusatory behavior.
  • They decide to stop using GrapheneOS, citing an inability to audit the code and a lack of trust in the developer.

Chapter 7

Final Decision and Reflection

7:58 - 10 min, 1 sec

The creator concludes with a final decision to discontinue using GrapheneOS and reflects on the situation.

The creator concludes with a final decision to discontinue using GrapheneOS and reflects on the situation.

  • The creator asserts they are not complicit in any harassment against Daniel Micay, simply disappointed in his behavior.
  • They express the difficulty of the decision due to the potential of GrapheneOS and their previous support for it.

More Louis Rossmann summaries

Forget about Sony and Netflix, there's DRM in public trains now....

Forget about Sony and Netflix, there's DRM in public trains now....

Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann

Discusses the erosion of ownership rights and the increasing corporate control over products post-purchase.

The Downfall of Amazon: Dangerous Products, Fake Reviews & Vanishing Brands

The Downfall of Amazon: Dangerous Products, Fake Reviews & Vanishing Brands

Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann

The video discusses the decline in product quality on Amazon and the presenter's decision to stop using the platform.

GM gets rid of Carplay and Android Auto for your safety

GM gets rid of Carplay and Android Auto for your safety

Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann

The video discusses General Motors' decision to remove Android Auto and Apple CarPlay from their vehicles, citing safety and accuracy, which the host criticizes.

Why my old business failed, how to not be a stupid failure like Louis Rossmann

Why my old business failed, how to not be a stupid failure like Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann

This video discusses the causes of failure in a previous business and how those lessons influenced better decisions in a current successful business.

Lenovo wants you to stop buying used PCs because they may have viruses on them 😂😂😂

Lenovo wants you to stop buying used PCs because they may have viruses on them 😂😂😂

Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann

The video is a detailed rebuttal to a Lenovo blog post, arguing against the company's negative stance on purchasing used or refurbished laptops.